Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida vs Federico Aguilar Cardozo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Almeida has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 44.27% of points compared to Cardozo's 40.31%. Could this give Almeida an advantage? It suggests potential superiority in serve stability.
• Conversely, Cardozo outperforms Almeida in return games, securing 50.49% of second serve return points versus Almeida's 48.56%. This suggests Cardozo could dominate if return play is crucial.
• Cardozo also holds a lead in returning first serves, achieving a 33.15% success rate, in contrast to Almeida’s 30.74%. Could this translate into more returned games won for Cardozo? Likely yes.
• Under pressure, Almeida excels at saving breakpoints, with a 51.98% success rate, overshadowing Cardozo’s 39.5%. This might indicate Almeida's resilience in critical moments.
• Overall match performance over the past year is nearly equivalent with Almeida winning 57.78% and Cardozo at 56.86%. Is this narrow gap substantial? It shows evenly matched capabilities.
• Both players excel on clay courts, with Cardozo slightly more proficient, boasting a 54% win rate, while Almeida has a 49% win rate on the same surface.
• Cardozo has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 270.24 compared to Almeida’s 315.73, suggesting Cardozo could be more adapted to tougher competition.
• In deciding set situations, Cardozo has a significant edge, winning 67% compared to Almeida’s 50%. Could this become a deciding factor if the match goes the distance?
• Break point conversion favors Cardozo as well, with a 54.84% success rate compared to Almeida's 29.25%, indicating better capitalization on scoring opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):

Almeida demonstrates strength in their second serve and resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. These attributes could be pivotal in critical situations during the match.

However, Cardozo excels in return games and has shown better performance in converting breakpoint opportunities, which could be decisive if the match involves tight games and frequent shifts in momentum.

Cardozo's experience against tougher opponents and superior performance in deciding sets further bolster their case as the likely winner in scenarios where endurance and adaptability are tested.

While both players have their strengths, the statistics lean slightly towards Cardozo. Based on recent performance patterns and comparative analysis, Cardozo is poised to win the upcoming tennis match.